There's a human element to officiating and the job is harder than most of us realize, especially in a game as fast as hockey.īut, at the very least, such a system would offer transparency to teams and fans and help the league keep receipts on the behavior of its officials. And before you rush to grab your pitchforks, that doesn't necessarily mean the league has to fine or suspend officials every time they get something wrong. The NHL could implement a similar system in which the league offices examine officiating decisions in each game and release reports on where things were called correctly or incorrectly. What might that look like? Well, for starters, the NHL could look at what the NBA does with its "Last Two Minute Reports." When it comes to those reports, the NBA investigates and analyzes the quality of officiating decisions toward the end of close games, and they release those findings to the public - openly conveying when refs get things right or wrong. The league could save a little face here by committing to accountability and transparency when it comes to on-ice officiating. It's easy enough to look past this behavior and say it's just part of the game, but the NHL does have an opportunity to use this latest incident as a catalyst for meaningful change. But why do we accept this as common practice? And, perhaps a better question, why are officials allowed to double-down on bad officiating without being held accountable by the league? Many times we've seen one team get hosed on a penalty call (or non-call), only to be conveniently gifted a make-up call shortly thereafter. Regardless of which camp you reside in, the next set of questions should be rather obvious: Where does the league go from here? Will this change anything? Would Peel have even gotten in trouble had he not been caught on a live mic? (I think we can all probably answer that last one.)Īgain, "game management" has long been accepted as part of hockey. Others will say that it's an adequate response that to the situation and the league's statement could serve as a warning shot to other officials who may find themselves in a similar set of circumstances moving forward. Some will view Peel's dismissal as the league feigning a moral stance while guiding him out the door slightly earlier than expected.
Just that he won't work any additional games. No where in the NHL's statement does it say that Peel was "fired" or "terminated" or anything of the like. Peel, 53, was set to retire from officiating at the end of this season anyway, so his dismissal only expedites his departure about a month early. The former ref immediately cooled off, probably fearing the heat he'd get on social media.While this seems like a surprisingly strong (though entirely appropriate) action from a league that doesn't often hold officials accountable in a public forum, it can also be argued that it's not quite as harsh as it appears on the surface. One of the young men attempted to call 911, but instead started filming Peel. Telling us that he’s going to contact the assignors, and we’re never going to ref another game again.” He stood in front of that door for 20 minutes. I have a couple questions.’ And he just berated us. “And he goes, ‘Do you know who the f- I am? You sit down and respect me. “And I said, ‘Hey, Tim, you can read, that says, ‘officials,’ not parents.
Boren said when Peel reached the referee’s room, he wedged his way into the doorway. Peel apparently was livid over McGlynn and Boren’s decision to toss Mayers and Lashoff, the two coaches, for their behavior during the game.
#Nhl referee tim peel series
It’s also the latest in a series of publicized incidents involving Peel. Louis area and elsewhere, the parents of the officials said. The alleged confrontation, involving a high-profile person with NHL ties, is all too common in youth hockey, both in the St. "Peel followed McGlynn and Boren into the room, where for the next 15-20 minutes, he blocked the exit, “berated” them and threatened their jobs, the teenagers told The Athletic.
0 kommentar(er)
